Testpad vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Testpad | OpenText Application Quality Management |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| Review count | 26 | 133 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Ease of setup | 9.3 | 7.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.6 | 8.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.7 | 8.5 |
| NPS | 56 | 31.2 |
| Small Business | 57.7% | 12.8% |
| Mid-Market | 26.9% | 21.1% |
| Enterprise | 15.4% | 66.2% |
| Total page views | 92 | 311 |
| Total LLM citations | 237 | 753 |
Testpad
Test plans, not test cases. Testpad is built on a different data model. Instead of a suite of test cases, each one a form to fill in with preconditions, steps and expected results, a plan is an outline of prompts. You write a test as a line of plain text, indent to group related tests under a heading, and add a column for each run you do. Established over 16 years ago, customers have included the likes of NVIDIA, GitHub, Bell, Siemens, Sony, HP, and Volvo. It's fast to work in. Type a line, hit enter, write the next one, instead of opening a multi-field form for every test.
- Ease of Use
- Test Cases
- User Interface
- Organization
- Intuitive UI
- Customizability
OpenText Application Quality Management
Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven, risk-based approach, align people with processes, mitigate application complexities, automate manual tasks, and establish end-to-end traceability. Gaining a complete view across all releases and projects grants you insights that help informed decisions.
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Implementation Ease
- Features
- Project Management
- Usage Frequency