G2 Vendor Directory

Tana vs. ScriptRunner for Jira

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricTana

by Tana

ScriptRunner for Jira

by Adaptavist

Overall rating4.34.4
Review count4826
Ease of use9.28.9
Ease of setup9.18.7
Quality of support8.98.2
Meets requirements8.99.1
NPS55.31914952
Small Business56.3%30.8%
Mid-Market35.4%34.6%
Enterprise8.3%34.6%
Total page views30389
Total LLM citations1,866267

Tana

Tana is where your meetings produce finished work, not just notes. Most tools stop at the transcript. Tana keeps going. It joins your meeting, captures the conversation, and turns it into the things you actually needed: action items assigned, decisions logged, a summary written, issues filed in GitHub or Linear, a draft ready to send. Often before the call ends. Everything then connects into one workspace that gets smarter the more you use it. Behind the calls, Tana is a connected workspace for notes, tasks, projects, and AI. You start by writing, and structure shows up when you need it.

Pros

    ScriptRunner for Jira

    Designed for Jira administrators of all technical backgrounds, ScriptRunner enables you to surpass the limitations of Jira through its unlimited and advanced automation and customisation capabilities. Harness the power of scripted automation with pre-built templates and an assisted coding experience, allowing you to swiftly fulfill advanced requirements and free yourself of repetitive manual tasks Trigger actions in response to issue creation using the Script Listeners Customise your configurations and gain control over your fields using Behaviours Keep teams synced with readily-calculated

    Pros

    • Customizability
    • Automation
    • Customization
    • Ease of Use
    • Jira Integration
    • Customer Support