Tabnine vs. Cursor
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Tabnine | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 72 | 329 |
| Ease of use | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Meets requirements | 7.7 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 52.173913 | 79.076923 |
| Small Business | 70.4% | 71.3% |
| Mid-Market | 22.5% | 21.3% |
| Enterprise | 7.0% | 7.5% |
| Total page views | 1,149 | 3,632 |
| Total LLM citations | 41,711 | 30,409 |
Tabnine
Tabnine provides the world’s most contextually-aware AI software development agents, autonomously completing the broadest variety of tasks across the SDLC without sacrificing privacy. Tabnine boosts engineering velocity and software quality through AI tools customized to each unique organization’s coding patterns, standards, and expectations.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- Features
- Auto-Suggestions
- Suggestions
- Productivity Improvement
Cursor
Cursor is an agentic coding platform for enterprises building ambitious software. With access to frontier models, developers can focus on higher-level direction, while agents drive implementation and code review. Used by 64% of Fortune 500 companies, Cursor accelerates software development without compromising quality, control, or security. Key Features and Functionality: - Agentic development workflows: Cursor helps developers delegate coding tasks to agents while staying in control of direction, review, and iteration.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- Features
- Performance Speed
- Problem Solving
- Time-saving