G2 Vendor Directory

Supabase vs. ScyllaDB

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricSupabase

by Supabase

ScyllaDB

by ScyllaDB

Overall rating4.64.5
Review count241429
Ease of use9.28.8
Ease of setup9.28.5
Quality of support8.78.8
Meets requirements9.39.0
NPS79.83193367.058824
Small Business77.2%41.7%
Mid-Market20.3%29.6%
Enterprise2.5%28.7%
Total page views2,1271,114
Total LLM citations23,7613,096

Supabase

Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform that enables developers to build and scale applications efficiently without managing server infrastructure. Launched in 2020 as an alternative to Firebase, Supabase offers a suite of tools including a PostgreSQL database, authentication, real-time subscriptions, and storage capabilities. By leveraging the robustness of PostgreSQL, Supabase provides a scalable and secure foundation for modern web and mobile applications.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Features
  • User-Friendly
  • Easy Integrations
  • Setup Ease
  • Integrations

ScyllaDB

ScyllaDB is a specialty database for workloads that require predictable performance at scale. It’s adopted by organizations that require ultra-low latency, even at millions of features or operations per second, billions of embeddings, or petabytes of storage. ScyllaDB’s shard-per-core architecture taps the full power of modern infrastructure, translating to fewer nodes, less admin, and lower costs. Over 400 companies such as Disney+, Discord, Tripadvisor, Expedia, Zillow, Starbucks, and Comcast use ScyllaDB for their toughest database challenges.

Pros

  • Performance
  • Speed
  • Scalability
  • Low Latency
  • Ease of Use
  • Querying