Supabase vs. ScyllaDB
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Supabase | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 241 | 429 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 79.831933 | 67.058824 |
| Small Business | 77.2% | 41.7% |
| Mid-Market | 20.3% | 29.6% |
| Enterprise | 2.5% | 28.7% |
| Total page views | 2,127 | 1,114 |
| Total LLM citations | 23,761 | 3,096 |
Supabase
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform that enables developers to build and scale applications efficiently without managing server infrastructure. Launched in 2020 as an alternative to Firebase, Supabase offers a suite of tools including a PostgreSQL database, authentication, real-time subscriptions, and storage capabilities. By leveraging the robustness of PostgreSQL, Supabase provides a scalable and secure foundation for modern web and mobile applications.
- Ease of Use
- Features
- User-Friendly
- Easy Integrations
- Setup Ease
- Integrations
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB is a specialty database for workloads that require predictable performance at scale. It’s adopted by organizations that require ultra-low latency, even at millions of features or operations per second, billions of embeddings, or petabytes of storage. ScyllaDB’s shard-per-core architecture taps the full power of modern infrastructure, translating to fewer nodes, less admin, and lower costs. Over 400 companies such as Disney+, Discord, Tripadvisor, Expedia, Zillow, Starbucks, and Comcast use ScyllaDB for their toughest database challenges.
- Performance
- Speed
- Scalability
- Low Latency
- Ease of Use
- Querying