Stova vs. X-CD
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Stova | X-CD |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 198 | 10 |
| Ease of use | 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Ease of setup | 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 8.3 | 9.6 |
| NPS | 44.329897 | 100 |
| Small Business | 40.1% | 80.0% |
| Mid-Market | 33.0% | 20.0% |
| Enterprise | 26.9% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 351 | 134 |
| Total LLM citations | 0 | 11 |
Stova
Flexibility that scales—from single conferences to global event portfolios. Stova powers events for organizations around the world, offering one platform to handle every stage of the process. From registration to real-time reporting, Stova adapts to how your team works, so every event can succeed your way.
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.