SQL Server on Virtual Machines vs. antsle Private Cloud
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | SQL Server on Virtual Machines | antsle Private Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 18 | 18 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Meets requirements | 8.7 | 9.7 |
| NPS | 86.666667 | 88.888889 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 77.8% |
| Mid-Market | 22.2% | 11.1% |
| Enterprise | 44.4% | 11.1% |
| Total page views | 73 | 28 |
| Total LLM citations | 4 | 5 |
SQL Server on Virtual Machines
Spin up a virtual machine, back up your SQL Server instance, and restore it into Azure. It’s that easy to reduce your capital investments and optimize operational expenses by migrating your on-premises SQL Server to the cloud. Spin up a virtual machine, back up your SQL Server instance, and restore it into Azure. It's that easy to reduce your capital investments and optimize operational expenses by migrating your on-premises SQL Server to the cloud.
antsle Private Cloud
The first full-stack private cloud solution. By leveraging both virtualization (KVM) and bare-metal containerization (LXC) side by side, the user has maximum flexibility on how to get the most out of any hardware.