SQL Secure vs. Protegrity
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | SQL Secure | Protegrity |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 21 | 14 |
| Ease of use | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Ease of setup | 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 7.6 | 9.3 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 47.619048 | 57.142857 |
| Small Business | 14.3% | 23.1% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 46.2% |
| Enterprise | 52.4% | 30.8% |
| Total page views | 88 | 307 |
| Total LLM citations | 22 | 666 |
SQL Secure
SQL Secure does not install any components, DLLs, scripts, stored procedures or tables on the SQL Server instances being monitored.
Protegrity
Protegrity secures the data and knowledge layer AI runs on, binding protection directly to the data itself rather than locking access around it. Its platform tokenizes, encrypts, and masks sensitive data at the field and knowledge-graph level, enforcing policy in real time at the point of a prompt, query, or answer — across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OpenShift, with FIPS-validated, post-quantum-ready cryptography.