SQL Secure vs. IBM Vault (formerly HashiCorp Vault)
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | SQL Secure | IBM Vault (formerly HashiCorp Vault) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 21 | 56 |
| Ease of use | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| Ease of setup | 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Quality of support | 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| NPS | 47.619048 | 54.545455 |
| Small Business | 14.3% | 25.5% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 32.7% |
| Enterprise | 52.4% | 41.8% |
| Total page views | 88 | 761 |
| Total LLM citations | 22 | 2,166 |
SQL Secure
SQL Secure does not install any components, DLLs, scripts, stored procedures or tables on the SQL Server instances being monitored.
IBM Vault (formerly HashiCorp Vault)
IBM Vault (formerly HashiCorp Vault) tightly controls access to secrets and encryption keys by authenticating against trusted sources of identity such as Active Directory, LDAP, Kubernetes, CloudFoundry, and cloud platforms. Vault enables fine grained authorization of which users and applications are permitted access to secrets and keys. Some of Vault's main use cases include: - Secrets Management - Identity Brokering - Data Encryption
- Security
- Ease of Use
- Integrations
- Easy Integrations
- Customer Support
- Management Ease