Splunk Real User Monitoring vs. Catchpoint
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Splunk Real User Monitoring | Catchpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 12 | 112 |
| Ease of use | 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 54.545455 | 68.807339 |
| Small Business | 16.7% | 11.7% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 22.5% |
| Enterprise | 50.0% | 65.8% |
| Total page views | 80 | 327 |
| Total LLM citations | 45 | 2,292 |
Splunk Real User Monitoring
Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM) helps you understand, measure, and improve your end user experience. Splunk RUM stitches together complete user sessions in an end to end view with backend performance, helping you understand how your entire environment impacts your customer experience, from backend services to web browsers and native mobile applications (iOS and Android).
- Monitoring
- Replay Features
- Tracing
- Deep Insights
- Analytics
- Real-time Monitoring
Catchpoint
The Internet relies on Catchpoint Global 5000 companies, top online retailers, financial services, cloud infrastructure and services companies, and xSPs trust Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) to detect and resolve internal or external issues across the Internet stack before they impact customers, employees, or digital experiences.
- Issue Detection
- Monitoring
- Customer Support
- Real-time Monitoring
- Alert Notifications
- Monitoring Services