G2 Vendor Directory

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring vs. Snare Central

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricSplunk Infrastructure Monitoring

by Cisco

Snare Central

by InterSect Alliance

Overall rating4.34.6
Review count4910
Ease of use8.08.6
Ease of setup8.38.6
Quality of support8.89.3
Meets requirements8.69.2
NPS51.02040870
Small Business18.4%20.0%
Mid-Market36.7%40.0%
Enterprise44.9%40.0%
Total page views16772
Total LLM citations68255

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

SignalFx is the only real-time cloud monitoring platform for infrastructure, microservices, and applications. The platform discovers and collects metrics across every component in your cloud environment, replacing traditional point tools and providing real-time predictive analytics. The massively scalable SignalFx architecture is optimized for cloud infrastructure and microservices-based applications, It provides powerful visualization, proactive alerting, and collaborative triage capabilities for organizations of all sizes.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Real-time Monitoring
  • Log Management
  • Monitoring
  • Dashboards
  • Monitoring Capabilities

Snare Central

When it comes to solving log collection and management challenges, Snare helps you save time, save money and reduce your risk. Snare Central ingests logs from Snare Agents and syslog feeds and you select which logs go where. You can collect and send to any number of SIEM systems, even multiple SIEMs from different vendors, your MSSP and/or your SOC, all while using Snare Central’s affordable archival storage options. Want to send different sets of logs to different destinations? Do you need to make sure you can seamlessly switch between SIEM providers? Snare can do that.

Pros