SpiraTeam vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | SpiraTeam | OpenText Application Quality Management |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Review count | 32 | 133 |
| Ease of use | 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.7 | 7.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 8.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 8.5 |
| NPS | 36.666667 | 31.2 |
| Small Business | 9.7% | 12.8% |
| Mid-Market | 61.3% | 21.1% |
| Enterprise | 29.0% | 66.2% |
| Total page views | 31 | 311 |
| Total LLM citations | 39 | 753 |
SpiraTeam
When you need to manage your entire project lifecycle, SpiraTeam is the solution. It covers the entire SDLC from requirements definition through development and testing, plus support and maintenance. The functionality includes requirements management and traceability, task management, program management, test management, bug tracking, source code and build management, workflow management, and document collaboration. SpiraTeam has the entire process covered. SpiraTeam integrates with over 60 tools on the market and comes with pre-built, free migration paths from several legacy tools.
- Ease of Use
- Team Collaboration
- Project Management
- Organization
- Features
- Easy Access
OpenText Application Quality Management
Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven, risk-based approach, align people with processes, mitigate application complexities, automate manual tasks, and establish end-to-end traceability. Gaining a complete view across all releases and projects grants you insights that help informed decisions.
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Implementation Ease
- Features
- Project Management
- Usage Frequency