G2 Vendor Directory

SoftNAS Cloud NAS vs. IBM Terraform (formerly HashiCorp Terraform)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricSoftNAS Cloud NAS

by SoftNAS

IBM Terraform (formerly HashiCorp Terraform)

by HashiCorp

Overall rating4.24.6
Review count11130
Ease of use8.48.9
Ease of setup8.69.0
Quality of support8.28.6
Meets requirements8.89.2
NPS45.45454578.4
Small Business18.2%34.4%
Mid-Market54.5%32.8%
Enterprise27.3%32.8%
Total page views13778
Total LLM citations01,933

SoftNAS Cloud NAS

SoftNAS is a Linux-based virtual NAS appliance deployed on public and private cloud services like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and VMware vSphere. SoftNAS can also run on RHEL if customers prefer it over CentOS. It runs as a virtual machine, providing a broad range of software-defined capabilities, including data performance, cost management, availability, control, and security. SoftNAS provides unified storage designed and optimized for high-performance, higher than normal I/O per second (IOPS), and data reliability and recoverability.

Pros

  • Cost Efficiency
  • Time-saving
  • Ease of Use
  • Useful

IBM Terraform (formerly HashiCorp Terraform)

IBM Terraform (formerly HashiCorp Terraform) is an infrastructure as code tool that lets you define both cloud and on-prem resources in human-readable configuration files that you can version, reuse, and share. You can then use a consistent workflow to provision and manage all of your infrastructure throughout its lifecycle. Terraform can manage low-level components like compute, storage, and networking resources, as well as high-level components like DNS entries and SaaS features.

Pros

  • Efficiency
  • Ease of Use
  • Automation
  • Automation Efficiency
  • Infrastructure Automation
  • Useful