SecureLink Enterprise Access vs. Symantec PAM
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | SecureLink Enterprise Access | Symantec PAM |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 3.6 |
| Review count | 54 | 22 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Ease of setup | 8.7 | 7.7 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Meets requirements | 8.7 | 7.8 |
| NPS | 59.259259 | 21.428571 |
| Small Business | 3.7% | 27.3% |
| Mid-Market | 40.7% | 31.8% |
| Enterprise | 55.6% | 40.9% |
| Total page views | 83 | 151 |
| Total LLM citations | 109 | 161 |
SecureLink Enterprise Access
Trying to authenticate, provision, and audit a rotating population of support technicians is a challenge that often results in shared logins, security vulnerabilities, and a lack of vendor accountability. SecureLink Enterprise Access allows you to manage and control the critical access your third parties need to systems, servers, and databases via a single solution, without having to sacrifice efficiency or security.
Symantec PAM
Symantec PAM is designed to prevent security breaches by protecting sensitive administrative credentials, controlling privileged user access, proactively enforcing security policies, and monitoring and recording privileged user activity across virtual, cloud, and physical environments. The solution provides a privileged credential vault, session recording, threat analytics, host-based access control for mission-critical servers, and application-to-application password management to address non-human actors, such as applications, configuration files, and scripts.
- Secure Access
- Access Control