G2 Vendor Directory

SecureAuth: Customer Identity Access Management vs. Instasafe ZTAA

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricSecureAuth: Customer Identity Access Management

by SecureAuth

Instasafe ZTAA

by InstaSafe Technologies

Overall rating4.14.7
Review count1146
Ease of use8.29.3
Ease of setup7.79.3
Quality of support9.09.4
Meets requirements8.79.6
NPS36.36363686.363636
Small Business27.3%15.2%
Mid-Market18.2%54.3%
Enterprise54.5%30.4%
Total page views136164
Total LLM citations72183

SecureAuth: Customer Identity Access Management

More security shouldn’t mean more obstacles. Since 2005, SecureAuth has helped leading companies simplify identity and access management for customers and employees—creating experiences that are as welcoming as they are secure. SecureAuth is redefining authentication for the modern enterprise. Today’s evolving threat landscape demands innovative, adaptive security solutions. As the first-to-market provider of continuous facial authentication, we go beyond the initial authentication to deliver ongoing security throughout the entire session.

Pros

  • Authentication
  • Ease of Use
  • Security
  • Security Authentication
  • Customer Support
  • Reliability

Instasafe ZTAA

InstaSafe is redefining the challenge of secure access to modern networks by leveraging Zero Trust principles with its security solutions, that ensure seamless access to cloud applications, SAP applications, on-premise data, IoT devices, and multiple other neoteric use cases. Instasafe discards traditional VPN based conceptions of a network perimeter, instead moving the perimeter to the individual users and the devices they access. The Zero Trust approach followed by InstaSafe mandates a “never trust, always verify' approach to privileged access, without focusing on network locality.

Pros