G2 Vendor Directory

Screenful vs. Tana

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricScreenful

by Screenful

Tana

by Tana

Overall rating4.44.3
Review count1848
Ease of use9.39.2
Ease of setup8.79.1
Quality of support9.78.9
Meets requirements8.58.9
NPS61.11111155.319149
Small Business55.6%56.3%
Mid-Market33.3%35.4%
Enterprise11.1%8.3%
Total page views30303
Total LLM citations971,866

Screenful

Screenful is the easiest way to get a visual dashboard and automated team status reports that keep every stakeholder updated on a project's status. Screenful integrates with most common task management tools (Jira, Trello, GitHub, GitLab, Linear, Asana, monday.com) and builds reports and insights based on your projects and tasks. It’s an out-of-the-box dashboard with minimal setup needed from the user. WIth Screenful, users can track things like team velocity, task/issue lead & cycle times, current bottlenecks, and get a high level view across all of their projects.

Pros

  • Reliability
  • Features
  • Metrics Analysis
  • Useful
  • Analytics
  • Insights

Tana

Tana is where your meetings produce finished work, not just notes. Most tools stop at the transcript. Tana keeps going. It joins your meeting, captures the conversation, and turns it into the things you actually needed: action items assigned, decisions logged, a summary written, issues filed in GitHub or Linear, a draft ready to send. Often before the call ends. Everything then connects into one workspace that gets smarter the more you use it. Behind the calls, Tana is a connected workspace for notes, tasks, projects, and AI. You start by writing, and structure shows up when you need it.

Pros