G2 Vendor Directory

SAS Asset Performance Analytics vs. AkitaBox

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricSAS Asset Performance Analytics

by SAS Institute

AkitaBox

by AkitaBox

Overall rating4.34.5
Review count10198
Ease of use8.89.1
Ease of setup8.69.2
Quality of support8.89.3
Meets requirements8.89.1
NPS4065.656566
Small Business20.0%29.9%
Mid-Market20.0%59.4%
Enterprise60.0%10.7%
Total page views11691
Total LLM citations91,039

SAS Asset Performance Analytics

Keep high-capital assets running at maximum efficiency to meet production goals and boost profitability – without increasing costs or risking failure. Predict problems in advance with machine sensor data that feeds to analytical models. And when there is a problem, diagnose it with root-cause analysis tools so you can take corrective action quickly.

Pros

    AkitaBox

    Simple. Secure. Seamless. And so much more than a CMMS. AkitaBox software is easy enough for everyone on your team to use. Powerful enough to handle asset management, maintenance management, capital management, facility condition assessments, and inspections in one secure system. No more frantic searching for documents in a cluttered plan room while a burst water pipe floods a hallway. End the uncertainty when an experienced team member retires. Centralize, manage, and track all of your facilities data digitally with AkitaBox.

    Pros

    • Ease of Use
    • Work Orders
    • Simple
    • Customer Support
    • Solution Comprehensive
    • Workflow Efficiency