Review Board vs. Greptile
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Review Board | Greptile |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| Review count | 16 | 28 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.5 | 8.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 8.1 |
| NPS | 50 | 42.857143 |
| Small Business | 0.0% | 64.3% |
| Mid-Market | 50.0% | 25.0% |
| Enterprise | 50.0% | 10.7% |
| Total page views | 66 | 404 |
| Total LLM citations | 76 | 560 |
Review Board
Review Board is an open-source, web-based code review tool designed to streamline the process of reviewing code changes, ensuring high-quality software development. It supports a wide range of version control systems, including Git, Subversion, Mercurial, Perforce, and ClearCase, making it adaptable to various development environments. Beyond code, Review Board facilitates the review of images, documents, and other file types, providing a comprehensive platform for collaborative evaluations.
- Review System
- Ease of Use
- Collaboration
- Productivity
- Team Collaboration
- Code Review
Greptile
Greptile is an AI code review tool for software teams. It reviews pull requests with context from the full codebase to identify bugs, security risks, and issues that span multiple files. Greptile indexes files, functions, and dependencies to assess how a change affects the wider system. It brings findings into the pull request workflow and lets developers send issue context to coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Devin. Teams can define review rules in plain English and provide repository-specific context.