Rackspace Managed Private Cloud vs. IBM Cloud Virtual Servers
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Rackspace Managed Private Cloud | IBM Cloud Virtual Servers |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 3.8 |
| Review count | 13 | 55 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Ease of setup | 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Quality of support | 9.3 | 7.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 8.4 |
| NPS | 53.846154 | 19.565217 |
| Small Business | 38.5% | 29.1% |
| Mid-Market | 53.8% | 23.6% |
| Enterprise | 7.7% | 47.3% |
| Total page views | 102 | 180 |
| Total LLM citations | 227 | 234 |
Rackspace Managed Private Cloud
Get the agility, scalability and efficiency of the public cloud, with the greater levels of control and security of a single-tenant, dedicated environment. It can be hosted on-site at your own data center or at a service provider's data center.
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers
IBM Cloud virtual server environments deliver cloud-native solutions that work across public, private and hybrid deployments. Boasting cost-savings, control, and visibility that is needed with a variety of flexible provisioning and pricing options, including single and multi-tenant environments, hourly and monthly pricing, reserved capacity terms and spot billing. Its elastic infrastructure, globally distributed data centers and premium services aim to bring data to life no matter where it resides.