G2 Vendor Directory

Qase vs. TestResults

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricQase

by Qase Inc

TestResults

by progile AG

Overall rating4.74.9
Review count32111
Ease of use9.49.0
Ease of setup9.49.5
Quality of support9.710.0
Meets requirements9.19.2
NPS84.22712990.909091
Small Business58.1%27.3%
Mid-Market34.5%54.5%
Enterprise7.3%18.2%
Total page views2,19659
Total LLM citations10,79720

Qase

Qase is a test management platform for QA and development teams responsible for quality. It brings CI results, automated test runs, and manual test cases into one system of record, so you can tell whether a release is ready from the data, not from a Slack thread or a judgment call. As a product grows, test results spread out. They sit across CI pipelines, spreadsheets, and issue trackers, with no single view tying them together. Requirements lose their link to test outcomes, so when something breaks in production it's hard to reconstruct what was tested.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Customer Support
  • Helpful
  • Integrations
  • Test Cases
  • User Interface

TestResults

TestResults is an enterprise software test automation platform that uses computer vision and deep learning to interact with applications like a human user - by looking at the screen, not by reading code or hidden element IDs. Unlike traditional test automation tools relying on object identifiers, XPath selectors, or API hooks, TestResults uses a locally deployed AI model to visually recognize UI elements and understand their context. This means tests remain stable even when the underlying code, element IDs, or UI layout change between releases. Who is it for?

Pros

  • Customer Support
  • Ease of Use
  • Automation Support
  • Automation
  • Learning Efficiency
  • Ease of Learning