G2 Vendor Directory

Protectimus vs. Instasafe ZTAA

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricProtectimus

by Protectimus Limited

Instasafe ZTAA

by InstaSafe Technologies

Overall rating4.84.7
Review count1846
Ease of use9.89.3
Ease of setup9.29.3
Quality of support10.09.4
Meets requirements9.89.6
NPS88.88888986.363636
Small Business77.8%15.2%
Mid-Market22.2%54.3%
Enterprise0.0%30.4%
Total page views120164
Total LLM citations130183

Protectimus

Protectimus Limited creates reliable products for organizing multifactor authentication in companies of all sizes — from startups to large corporations. The Protectimus lineup includes plugins for quick integration with ADFS, Citrix NetScaler and XenApp, VMware, RoundCube, SSH, RADIUS, SAML and SSO, Windows Login, Microsoft RDP, Azure, and OWA. The two-factor authentication service is available in-cloud and on-premises. Among offered authentication methods are classic and programmable hardware OTP tokens, mobile app, email, SMS, and chatbots in messaging apps.

Pros

  • Secure Sharing
  • Easy Setup
  • Ease of Use
  • Security

Instasafe ZTAA

InstaSafe is redefining the challenge of secure access to modern networks by leveraging Zero Trust principles with its security solutions, that ensure seamless access to cloud applications, SAP applications, on-premise data, IoT devices, and multiple other neoteric use cases. Instasafe discards traditional VPN based conceptions of a network perimeter, instead moving the perimeter to the individual users and the devices they access. The Zero Trust approach followed by InstaSafe mandates a “never trust, always verify' approach to privileged access, without focusing on network locality.

Pros