Productiv vs. AccessOwl
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Productiv | AccessOwl |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 76 | 13 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.5 | 10.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.5 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 75.675676 | 84.615385 |
| Small Business | 2.6% | 30.8% |
| Mid-Market | 38.2% | 69.2% |
| Enterprise | 59.2% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 311 | 190 |
| Total LLM citations | 4,476 | 808 |
Productiv
Productiv is used by IT and security leaders who are expected to say “yes” to AI innovation while keeping company data safe, compliant, and in budget. AI is already inside your SaaS stack (you just can’t see it clearly). Productiv gives you a single system of record for all SaaS and AI usage so you can identify AI tools, understand how they use your data, and put real guardrails in place without slowing the business down. The platform pulls together SSO, expense, contracts, security signals, and usage analytics into one view of every application, feature, user, and team.
- Ease of Use
- SaaS Management
- Features
- Application Integration
- Data Analytics
- Customer Experience
AccessOwl
Orchestrate your employees' access to SaaS tools. Automate access requests, approvals and provisioning workflows. Automate on- & offboarding workflows Covering the entire employee lifecycle: AccessOwl ensures that new employees have access to all relevant tools on their starting date. Offboarding an user is as simple as a click of a button and no access is ever forgotten. Aligning HR, IT and line manager — eliminating the need for back-and-forth communication. Simplify approval workflows Your team can easily request new accesses on-demand via self-service — without leaving Slack.
- Ease of Use
- Easy Integrations
- Simple
- Application Integration
- Integrations
- Customer Support