Perimeter vs. Secureframe
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Perimeter | Secureframe |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 46 | 839 |
| Ease of use | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Ease of setup | 9.1 | 9.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.9 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.4 |
| NPS | 91.111111 | 82.795699 |
| Small Business | 15.6% | 68.7% |
| Mid-Market | 33.3% | 29.4% |
| Enterprise | 51.1% | 1.8% |
| Total page views | 451 | 4,903 |
| Total LLM citations | 814 | 34,366 |
Perimeter
Painless end-to-end VRM: Perimeter covers the full VRM lifecycle for your entire vendor universe while cutting manual effort more than 80%. Unlimited scalability: Perimeter makes it easy to scale your VRM program to any number of vendors without hiring dozens of new roles. Fully customizable and branded for your organization: All assessments, logic, design, and language is fully customizable to your needs, processes, and brand.
- Ease of Use
- Vendor Management
- Insights
- Time-saving
- Helpful
- Automation
Secureframe
Secureframe empowers businesses to build trust with customers by simplifying information security and compliance through AI and automation. Thousands of organizations such as AngelList, Nasdaq, Coda, and Remote trust Secureframe to help them obtain and maintain compliance with global information security standards.
- Ease of Use
- Compliance
- Automation
- Security
- Integrations
- Time-saving