Plastic SCM vs. P4
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Plastic SCM | P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 36 | 95 |
| Ease of use | 8.2 | 8.0 |
| Ease of setup | 8.3 | 7.7 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.0 | 8.7 |
| NPS | 50 | 40.860215 |
| Small Business | 63.9% | 25.3% |
| Mid-Market | 16.7% | 35.8% |
| Enterprise | 19.4% | 38.9% |
| Total page views | 69 | 224 |
| Total LLM citations | 432 | 853 |
Plastic SCM
Version control is the operating system of software development. It can solve problems efficiently and silently, or it can create more. Plastic SCM is a distributed version control, but can work centralized too. It is excellent with branching and merging, can deal with huge projects and big binary assets natively, and it comes with GUIs and tools to make everything simpler. Plastic solves problems.
P4
Perforce P4 is an industry-standard version control platform built for teams working with large, complex codebases and digital assets. Designed to handle scale where other tools hit limits, P4 helps teams accelerate production, eliminate file sharing chaos, and keep every version tracked and recoverable. Whether your team is distributed or moving fast toward release, P4 makes it easy to collaborate efficiently and stay in control—no matter the size or complexity of your projects. P4 is trusted by the world’s most innovative brands, including Pixar, NVIDIA, Scania, EA, Ubisoft, and VMware.