Plastic SCM vs. CVS
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Plastic SCM | CVS |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 3.5 |
| Review count | 36 | 13 |
| Ease of use | 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Ease of setup | 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 7.6 |
| Meets requirements | 8.0 | 7.7 |
| NPS | 50 | -7.692308 |
| Small Business | 63.9% | 0.0% |
| Mid-Market | 16.7% | 0.0% |
| Enterprise | 19.4% | 100.0% |
| Total page views | 69 | 72 |
| Total LLM citations | 432 | 38 |
Plastic SCM
Version control is the operating system of software development. It can solve problems efficiently and silently, or it can create more. Plastic SCM is a distributed version control, but can work centralized too. It is excellent with branching and merging, can deal with huge projects and big binary assets natively, and it comes with GUIs and tools to make everything simpler. Plastic solves problems.
CVS
CVS is a version control system, an important component of Source Configuration Management (SCM). Using it, you can record the history of sources files, and documents. It fills a similar role to the free software RCS, PRCS, and Aegis packages.