G2 Vendor Directory

Oyster vs. Lano

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricOyster

by Oyster

Lano

by Lano

Overall rating4.44.0
Review count1,62416
Ease of use9.28.5
Ease of setup9.08.4
Quality of support8.98.3
Meets requirements9.18.5
NPS57.17981943.75
Small Business46.9%31.3%
Mid-Market48.5%62.5%
Enterprise4.6%6.3%
Total page views2,264185
Total LLM citations16,384306

Oyster

Hire in 180+ countries with compliant onboarding in as little as 48 hours. Get dedicated HR experts, predictable (and transparent) pricing, and support for complex employee situations—without juggling multiple vendors. Oyster is an Employer of Record that helps you employ and care for talent in 180+ countries—without opening legal entities or stitching together local vendors. From one intuitive platform, you can generate compliant contracts, run payroll, and offer competitive, country-specific benefits to employees and contractors around the world. But software is only half the story.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Helpful
  • Customer Support
  • Simple
  • Intuitive
  • User Interface

Lano

Lano is the most flexible global payroll provider on the market. Whether starting your expansion from scratch, replacing existing providers, or enriching your existing infrastructure, Lano adapts to your unique business needs.  With services like global payroll, consolidation, Employer of Record, multi-currency payments, and contractor management, we transform manual, time-consuming tasks into centralized, streamlined, automated processes.

Pros

  • Payroll
  • Ease of Use
  • Response Time
  • Payroll Ease
  • Customer Support
  • Simple