Output vs. COMPASS Quality Management System
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Output | COMPASS Quality Management System |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 10 | 50 |
| Ease of use | 10.0 | 8.2 |
| Ease of setup | 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 8.2 |
| NPS | 80 | 43.75 |
| Small Business | 22.2% | 12.5% |
| Mid-Market | 55.6% | 41.7% |
| Enterprise | 22.2% | 45.8% |
| Total page views | 31 | 65 |
| Total LLM citations | 17 | 95 |
Output
Manual processes to engage employees can kickstart a culture of innovation in your company, but they come with huge limitations. Gathering ideas at scale across time zones and departments, keeping processes and decisions transparent, documenting everything in one place, and measuring engagement so you can optimize it next time -- it all takes more of your time than it should. When you’re ready to scale and empower your efforts, Output's flexible, user-friendly engagement platform and best practices can help.
COMPASS Quality Management System
For a 5-minute demonstration of COMPASS, go to www.creato.com/compass COMPASS is a project portfolio management system that collects and ranks ideas, allows management to engage in feedback with employees to improve ideas, rescore ideas, and approve ideas. Once ideas become projects, COMPASS will guide the end user with just-in-time tools and training. Tools are extensive and include descriptive and inferential statistics in addition to simple brainstorming tools. Training is derived from the ASQ Lean Body of Knowledge.