MetaAccess vs. FortiNAC
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | MetaAccess | FortiNAC |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.9 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 14 | 20 |
| Ease of use | 8.0 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 6.4 | 7.9 |
| Quality of support | 6.3 | 8.4 |
| Meets requirements | 7.7 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 21.428571 | 55 |
| Small Business | 21.4% | 10.0% |
| Mid-Market | 42.9% | 55.0% |
| Enterprise | 35.7% | 35.0% |
| Total page views | 144 | 235 |
| Total LLM citations | 118 | 1,077 |
MetaAccess
Zero-Trust Access (ZTA), an approach that considers all entities untrusted by default, is rapidly becoming the industry standard and being mandated by regulatory bodies including governments. Leveraging the latest ZTA technologies, OPSWAT’s MetaAccess Zero-Trust Access Platform is a unified platform cloud solution for providing deep endpoint compliance, advanced endpoint protection, identity authorization, and secure access without hindering workflows. MetaAccess delivers security compliance, visibility, and control to every device and user accessing enterprise resources.
FortiNAC
FortiNAC provides the network visibility to see everything connected to the network, as well as the ability to control those devices and users, including dynamic, automated responses.