OpenWater Application and Review Cloud vs. Zealous
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenWater Application and Review Cloud | Zealous |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 152 | 16 |
| Ease of use | 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Quality of support | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Meets requirements | 9.1 | 9.6 |
| NPS | 65.131579 | 81.25 |
| Small Business | 64.9% | 93.3% |
| Mid-Market | 30.5% | 6.7% |
| Enterprise | 4.6% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 604 | 169 |
| Total LLM citations | 2,144 | 424 |
OpenWater Application and Review Cloud
OpenWater streamlines program management with its end-to-end solution for accepting and reviewing applications, awards, grants, scholarships, proposals, and abstracts. OpenWater’s secure, all-in-one platform makes navigating the review process easy with its user-friendly features. Empower your program administrators by automating time consuming administrative tasks, collecting high volume submissions, and driving data-proven decisions through custom reporting and analytics.
Zealous
Zealous is a cloud-based submissions management platform for any program that collects and evaluates entries: awards, competitions, grants, open calls, residencies, fairs, and commissions. One subscription covers unlimited programs, so an awards program in spring, a grant round in autumn, and a residency call in winter all run from the same dashboard, with the same login and the same support team. Entry collection, judging, payments, and results live in one place instead of spread across forms, spreadsheets, and email. Zealous is built around presentation.