OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) vs. Projectworks
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) | Projectworks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 29 | 253 |
| Ease of use | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Quality of support | 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 8.7 |
| NPS | 25 | 66.942149 |
| Small Business | 20.7% | 64.8% |
| Mid-Market | 13.8% | 32.0% |
| Enterprise | 65.5% | 3.3% |
| Total page views | 178 | 2,483 |
| Total LLM citations | 159 | 5,637 |
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)
Today's project management organization (PMO) struggles with time, cost, and resource management challenges, particularly visibility and data consolidation within the enterprise portfolio. Given these daily challenges, it is difficult for executives to see which projects and operational activities they should be working on to find out how much is left in their budget, to what capacity are resources being utilized, and how to align activities with business demands.
Projectworks
Grow your firm, and your impact. Projectworks is AI-powered, operator-built professional services automation software for consulting firms that want to grow and make a difference. Bringing deals, proposals, time tracking, resourcing, invoicing, and forecasting together in one platform, it gives you the visibility to see what’s working, fix what’s not, and scale your firm with confidence. Projectworks was built by consultants who know what it’s like to lose hours to spreadsheets and billing chaos.
- Ease of Use
- Project Management
- User-Friendly
- Project Tracking
- Comprehensive Features
- User Interface