OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) vs. Harvest
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 29 | 845 |
| Ease of use | 7.5 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Quality of support | 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 25 | 48.809524 |
| Small Business | 20.7% | 72.7% |
| Mid-Market | 13.8% | 22.6% |
| Enterprise | 65.5% | 4.8% |
| Total page views | 178 | 1,334 |
| Total LLM citations | 159 | 21,793 |
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)
Today's project management organization (PMO) struggles with time, cost, and resource management challenges, particularly visibility and data consolidation within the enterprise portfolio. Given these daily challenges, it is difficult for executives to see which projects and operational activities they should be working on to find out how much is left in their budget, to what capacity are resources being utilized, and how to align activities with business demands.
Harvest
Harvest makes it easy to track time, gain insights from past projects, and get paid for your work. Dedicated apps and integrations with popular tools like Asana and Slack allow Harvest to fit into your team’s workflow. A wide selection of visual reports keep projects running smoothly and your team supported. Turn your team’s tracked time and expenses into invoices and collect payment quickly with integrated online payments. Help your team spend time wisely with Harvest.
- Time Tracking
- Ease of Use
- Time-saving
- Integrations
- Visibility
- Invoicing