G2 Vendor Directory

Opentext functional Testing vs. Qase

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricOpentext functional Testing

by OpenText

Qase

by Qase Inc

Overall rating4.24.7
Review count46321
Ease of use8.49.4
Ease of setup8.39.4
Quality of support8.79.7
Meets requirements8.99.1
NPS46.66666784.227129
Small Business26.1%58.1%
Mid-Market21.7%34.5%
Enterprise52.2%7.3%
Total page views1062,196
Total LLM citations20310,797

Opentext functional Testing

Test automation to make manual testing more efficient and let developers and testers collaborate.

Pros

    Qase

    Qase is a test management platform for QA and development teams responsible for quality. It brings CI results, automated test runs, and manual test cases into one system of record, so you can tell whether a release is ready from the data, not from a Slack thread or a judgment call. As a product grows, test results spread out. They sit across CI pipelines, spreadsheets, and issue trackers, with no single view tying them together. Requirements lose their link to test outcomes, so when something breaks in production it's hard to reconstruct what was tested.

    Pros

    • Ease of Use
    • Customer Support
    • Helpful
    • Integrations
    • Test Cases
    • User Interface