OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. testRigor
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web | testRigor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 11 | 47 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Quality of support | 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 27.272727 | 76.086957 |
| Small Business | 18.2% | 53.2% |
| Mid-Market | 45.5% | 44.7% |
| Enterprise | 36.4% | 2.1% |
| Total page views | 13 | 1,898 |
| Total LLM citations | 0 | 9,453 |
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Micro Focus UFT Mobile offers extra components that can be used with HPE Mobile Center 2.01 Patch 1.
testRigor
Software QA testers use testRigor codeless testing tool to create robust end-to-end functional tests. Software testing made easy: create cross-platform tests using no code for web, native and hybrid mobile applications, desktop, and API. Utilize email testing, visual testing and audio testing built-in features. Create your automated tests 15x faster and with 95% less test maintenance than traditional automation testing tools. Execute tests in parallel and receive results in minutes, not hours. Easily integrate with your favorite issue management tools, CI/CD tools, and so on.
- Ease of Use
- Automation
- Time-saving
- Customer Support
- Positive Results
- Implementation Ease