OpenText Forensic (EnCase) vs. Microsoft Purview Audit
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenText Forensic (EnCase) | Microsoft Purview Audit |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 13 | 34 |
| Ease of use | 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Quality of support | 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Meets requirements | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 61.538462 | 50 |
| Small Business | 53.8% | 44.1% |
| Mid-Market | 30.8% | 23.5% |
| Enterprise | 15.4% | 32.4% |
| Total page views | 228 | 174 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,029 | 404 |
OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
EnCase Forensic enables you to quickly search, identify, and prioritize potential evidence, in computers and mobile devices, to determine whether further investigation is warranted.
Microsoft Purview Audit
Efficiently respond to legal matters or internal investigations with intelligent capabilities that reduce data to only what’s relevant. Discover data where it lives: Discover and collect data in place, within your Microsoft Purview boundary. Manage workflows efficiently: Streamline your eDiscovery process with an end-to-end workflow from one platform. Accelerate your process: Get insights quickly with built-in capabilities, reducing review time and costs.
- Features
- Security Protection
- Data Management
- Navigation Ease
- Collaboration
- Tools