OpenText Deployment Automation 25.2 vs. Progress Chef
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenText Deployment Automation 25.2 | Progress Chef |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 12 | 136 |
| Ease of use | 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Quality of support | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Meets requirements | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 81.818182 | 51.879699 |
| Small Business | 41.7% | 22.8% |
| Mid-Market | 16.7% | 38.2% |
| Enterprise | 41.7% | 39.0% |
| Total page views | 70 | 684 |
| Total LLM citations | 14 | 604 |
OpenText Deployment Automation 25.2
Deployment Automation (formerly Serena Deployment Automation) supports continuous delivery and production deployments by automating the deployment pipeline, reducing cycle times, and providing rapid feedback to development and test teams.
Progress Chef
The Progress Chef portfolio consists of multiple, integrated products. It offers a set of capabilities that provide organizations the flexibility to support different use cases. All these capabilities are based on a trusted set of tools rooted in open source, starting with the ability to configure, deploy and manage all aspects of a technology stack as well as the ability to secure and support compliance across the asset fleet.