G2 Vendor Directory

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Qt

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricOpenText Application Quality Management

by OpenText

Qt

by Qt Group

Overall rating4.04.3
Review count13354
Ease of use8.28.6
Ease of setup7.68.8
Quality of support8.08.6
Meets requirements8.58.8
NPS31.249.056604
Small Business12.8%50.0%
Mid-Market21.1%27.8%
Enterprise66.2%22.2%
Total page views311687
Total LLM citations7532,931

OpenText Application Quality Management

Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven, risk-based approach, align people with processes, mitigate application complexities, automate manual tasks, and establish end-to-end traceability. Gaining a complete view across all releases and projects grants you insights that help informed decisions.

Pros

  • Customer Support
  • Ease of Use
  • Implementation Ease
  • Features
  • Project Management
  • Usage Frequency

Qt

Read more about our product here: https://www.qt.io/product Programming should be fast, easy and fun. That’s why we have been focusing on improving software development for the last 25 years, and with the amount of applications and devices growing every day, efficiency has become more important than ever. Qt has everything you need to quickly and cost-effectively design, develop, test, deploy and maintain your software for any project. Focus on creating the best user experiences instead of coding what’s already been coded for you.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
  • Fast Development
  • Compatibility
  • User Interface
  • Documentation Quality