G2 Vendor Directory

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricOpenText Application Quality Management

by OpenText

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

by IBM

Overall rating4.04.0
Review count133136
Ease of use8.27.7
Ease of setup7.66.7
Quality of support8.08.1
Meets requirements8.58.4
NPS31.225.203252
Small Business12.8%12.5%
Mid-Market21.1%28.7%
Enterprise66.2%58.8%
Total page views311440
Total LLM citations7537,758

OpenText Application Quality Management

Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven, risk-based approach, align people with processes, mitigate application complexities, automate manual tasks, and establish end-to-end traceability. Gaining a complete view across all releases and projects grants you insights that help informed decisions.

Pros

  • Customer Support
  • Ease of Use
  • Implementation Ease
  • Features
  • Project Management
  • Usage Frequency

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next is a scalable management solution for the communication, collaboration and verification of your requirements. It enables you to capture, trace, analyze and manage changes to requirements while maintaining compliance to your industry’s specific regulations and standards. With DOORS Next, you can improve time to market, product quality and lower costs through the comprehensive management of requirements from beginning to end of your development project.

Pros

  • Data Management
  • Flexibility
  • Documentation