Codex vs. Cursor
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Codex | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 19 | 329 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.5 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 83.333333 | 79.076923 |
| Small Business | 47.4% | 71.3% |
| Mid-Market | 31.6% | 21.3% |
| Enterprise | 21.1% | 7.5% |
| Total page views | 437 | 3,632 |
| Total LLM citations | 7,269 | 30,409 |
Codex
Codex is OpenAI’s agentic coding partner built to accelerate real engineering work end-to-end, helping you plan, implement features, refactor, review, and ship releases while fitting into the tools and workflows developers already use. Rather than acting like a chat-only assistant, it’s positioned as a “build with agents” experience that can take on substantive tasks (and context) across a codebase so you spend less time on repetitive execution and more time on decisions, design, and quality.
Cursor
Cursor is an agentic coding platform for enterprises building ambitious software. With access to frontier models, developers can focus on higher-level direction, while agents drive implementation and code review. Used by 64% of Fortune 500 companies, Cursor accelerates software development without compromising quality, control, or security. Key Features and Functionality: - Agentic development workflows: Cursor helps developers delegate coding tasks to agents while staying in control of direction, review, and iteration.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- Features
- Performance Speed
- Problem Solving
- Time-saving