Codex vs. Amp
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Codex | Amp |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 19 | 92 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.5 | 8.6 |
| NPS | 83.333333 | 65.934066 |
| Small Business | 47.4% | 68.5% |
| Mid-Market | 31.6% | 20.7% |
| Enterprise | 21.1% | 10.9% |
| Total page views | 437 | 506 |
| Total LLM citations | 7,269 | 9,246 |
Codex
Codex is OpenAI’s agentic coding partner built to accelerate real engineering work end-to-end, helping you plan, implement features, refactor, review, and ship releases while fitting into the tools and workflows developers already use. Rather than acting like a chat-only assistant, it’s positioned as a “build with agents” experience that can take on substantive tasks (and context) across a codebase so you spend less time on repetitive execution and more time on decisions, design, and quality.
Amp
Sourcegraph’s AI code assistant goes beyond individual dev productivity, helping enterprises achieve consistency and quality at scale with AI. Sourcegraph accelerates the entire workflow for developers by providing them a more natural and intuitive way to work. Searching code, chatting with AI, invoking prompts, and using agents can now all be performed in one place with the best models available.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- User Experience
- Easy Integrations
- Features
- Time-saving