OnSecurity vs. Bugcrowd
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OnSecurity | Bugcrowd |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 37 | 61 |
| Ease of use | 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.7 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 94.444444 | 51.666667 |
| Small Business | 64.9% | 35.1% |
| Mid-Market | 29.7% | 28.1% |
| Enterprise | 5.4% | 36.8% |
| Total page views | 302 | 1,050 |
| Total LLM citations | 420 | 9,423 |
OnSecurity
OnSecurity is the CREST-accredited AI-augmented penetration testing platform that unifies expert-led manual testing, continuous vulnerability management, and remediation tracking in one connected programme. Built by penetration testers for security and engineering teams, OnSecurity's Platform moves organisations beyond one-off, point-in-time pentests to an always-on offensive security programme.
Bugcrowd
Bugcrowd frees organizations with a low tolerance for risk from chronic talent shortages, noisy tools that breed false positives, and the fear of critical hidden or emerging vulnerabilities. Our SaaS platform provides access to the unlimited capacity and skills of the global ethical hacker/pentester community for deeper, proactive risk reduction and faster regulatory compliance. With 12+ years of experience and 1200+ customers in every industry (including OpenAI, National Australia Bank, Indeed, USAA, Twilio, and CISA), we know what long-term with crowdsourced security looks like.
- Reporting Quality
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Vulnerability Detection
- Communication
- Features