G2 Vendor Directory

Netwrix PingCastle vs. Silverfort

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricNetwrix PingCastle

by Netwrix

Silverfort

by Silverfort

Overall rating4.44.8
Review count1518
Ease of use9.79.9
Ease of setup9.09.3
Quality of support8.49.9
Meets requirements9.39.4
NPS53.33333388.888889
Small Business53.3%44.4%
Mid-Market40.0%38.9%
Enterprise6.7%16.7%
Total page views236457
Total LLM citations182,287

Netwrix PingCastle

Netwrix PingCastle runs an Entra ID & Active Directory security assessment so you can find vulnerabilities, reduce attack surface, and secure your environment - fast, with clear insights and remediation guidance. Netwrix PingCastle enhances identity security by scanning for misconfigurations, outdated settings, and other risk indicators, mapping results to industry frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK and ANSSI so you can prioritize remediation and align your security posture with recognized standards.

Pros

    Silverfort

    Silverfort’s Unified Identity Protection Platform is the first to consolidate security controls across corporate networks and cloud environments to block identity-based attacks. Using innovative agentless and proxyless technology, Silverfort seamlessly integrates with all existing IAM solutions (e.g., AD, RADIUS, Azure AD, Okta, Ping, AWS IAM), extending coverage to assets that could not previously have been protected, such as legacy applications, IT infrastructure, file systems, command-line tools, and machine-to-machine access.

    Pros

    • Security
    • Ease of Use
    • MFA Security
    • Setup Ease
    • Time-Saving
    • Ease of Management