Mangopay vs. Shufti
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Mangopay | Shufti |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 42 | 156 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 69.047619 | 67.096774 |
| Small Business | 45.2% | 73.9% |
| Mid-Market | 40.5% | 24.8% |
| Enterprise | 14.3% | 1.3% |
| Total page views | 205 | 4,130 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,785 | 4,882 |
Mangopay
Founded in 2013, Mangopay is the wallet-first infrastructure for multi-party payment flows, designed to give platforms the control, scalability, and revenue opportunities they need to thrive. Mangopay offers programmable wallets that mirror real-world multi-party experiences, empowering platforms to hold, split, and move funds across buyers, sellers, and partners, while unlocking new monetization streams. Mangopay’s end-to-end white-label infrastructure provides embedded finance features such as Virtual IBANs, FX, and acquirer-agnostic payment processing with automated reconciliation.
- Easy Payments
- Ease of Use
- Flexibility
- Payment Services
- Customer Satisfaction
- Features
Shufti
Shufti is Trust OS, the Glocal platform for identity, AML, and fraud prevention. One platform across the full customer lifecycle, so a customer’s entire risk picture lives in a single view, not ten systems: --- Onboard - “Who are we dealing with?” KYC and KYB that establish trust at the start: identity, document, face, NFC and docless verification, address verification, UBO checks and business due diligence, plus age verification, customer risk assessment, and AML screening across sanctions, PEP and RCA, watchlists and adverse media.
- Ease of Use
- Onboarding
- User Experience
- Easy Integrations
- Customer Support
- Compliance