netFORUM Pro vs. X-CD
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | netFORUM Pro | X-CD |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 1.6 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 13 | 10 |
| Ease of use | 3.6 | 9.1 |
| Ease of setup | 4.0 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 3.8 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 4.0 | 9.6 |
| NPS | -76.923077 | 100 |
| Small Business | 69.2% | 80.0% |
| Mid-Market | 30.8% | 20.0% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 25 | 134 |
| Total LLM citations | 15 | 11 |
netFORUM Pro
netFORUM Pro provides membership management features, reporting and enhanced tools to allow associations to interact with member and member management.
X-CD
Most academic research and medical societies are running their operations on five different tools — a membership database, a separate abstract submission system, a conference registration platform, a peer review tool, and a proceedings publisher. Each was signed at a different time, with a different vendor, and the data moves between them through CSV exports and a staff member who knows where the bodies are buried. X-CD replaces all of it.