N-able Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. IBM QRadar EDR
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | N-able Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | IBM QRadar EDR |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 18 | 47 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 8.7 | 7.7 |
| Quality of support | 9.0 | 8.4 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 44.444444 | 44.444444 |
| Small Business | 50.0% | 44.7% |
| Mid-Market | 50.0% | 40.4% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 14.9% |
| Total page views | 137 | 57 |
| Total LLM citations | 294 | 4 |
N-able Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
N-able Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), powered by SentinelOne®, helps MSPs and IT departments prevent, detect, and quickly respond to ever-changing cyberthreats with behavioral AI threat detection, automated remediation, and rollback. Leverage powerful EDR integration with the N‑able N‑sight RMM or N‑able N‑central solutions to gain holistic monitoring and management capabilities.
- Incident Response
- Threat Detection
- Customer Support
- XDR Capabilities
- Ease of Use
- Implementation Ease
IBM QRadar EDR
IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. IBM Security QRadar EDR is available on AWS Marketplace. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users protected.
- Threat Detection
- Ease of Use
- Cybersecurity
- Detection Efficiency
- Protection
- Monitoring