Microsoft Purview Audit vs. OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Microsoft Purview Audit | OpenText Forensic (EnCase) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 34 | 13 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Ease of setup | 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Quality of support | 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 8.3 |
| NPS | 50 | 61.538462 |
| Small Business | 44.1% | 53.8% |
| Mid-Market | 23.5% | 30.8% |
| Enterprise | 32.4% | 15.4% |
| Total page views | 174 | 228 |
| Total LLM citations | 404 | 1,029 |
Microsoft Purview Audit
Efficiently respond to legal matters or internal investigations with intelligent capabilities that reduce data to only what’s relevant. Discover data where it lives: Discover and collect data in place, within your Microsoft Purview boundary. Manage workflows efficiently: Streamline your eDiscovery process with an end-to-end workflow from one platform. Accelerate your process: Get insights quickly with built-in capabilities, reducing review time and costs.
- Features
- Security Protection
- Data Management
- Navigation Ease
- Collaboration
- Tools
OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
EnCase Forensic enables you to quickly search, identify, and prioritize potential evidence, in computers and mobile devices, to determine whether further investigation is warranted.