G2 Vendor Directory

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. IBM QRadar EDR

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management

by Microsoft

IBM QRadar EDR

by IBM

Overall rating4.44.2
Review count3447
Ease of use8.98.7
Ease of setup8.47.7
Quality of support8.98.4
Meets requirements8.79.1
NPS55.88235344.444444
Small Business41.2%44.7%
Mid-Market23.5%40.4%
Enterprise35.3%14.9%
Total page views18857
Total LLM citations9744

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

Defender Vulnerability Management delivers asset visibility, intelligent assessments, and built-in remediation tools for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and network devices. Leveraging Microsoft threat intelligence, breach likelihood predictions, business contexts, and devices assessments, Defender Vulnerability Management rapidly and continuously prioritizes the biggest vulnerabilities on your most critical assets and provides security recommendations to mitigate risk. Reduce risk with continuous vulnerability assessment, risk-based prioritization, and remediation.

Pros

    IBM QRadar EDR

    IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. IBM Security QRadar EDR is available on AWS Marketplace. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users protected.

    Pros

    • Threat Detection
    • Ease of Use
    • Cybersecurity
    • Detection Efficiency
    • Protection
    • Monitoring