Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs. Tenable Nessus
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management | Tenable Nessus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 17 | 320 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Ease of setup | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 47.058824 | 68.852459 |
| Small Business | 35.3% | 27.1% |
| Mid-Market | 35.3% | 39.7% |
| Enterprise | 29.4% | 33.1% |
| Total page views | 206 | 1,872 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,138 | 24,390 |
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
In this era of hybrid work, shadow IT creates an increasingly serious security risk. Defender EASM helps cloud security teams see unknown and unmanaged resources outside the firewall.
Tenable Nessus
Built for security practitioners, by security professionals, Nessus products by Tenable are the de-facto industry standard for vulnerability assessment. Nessus performs point-in-time assessments to help security professionals quickly and easily identify and fix vulnerabilities, including software flaws, missing patches, malware, and misconfigurations - across a variety of operating systems, devices, and applications.
- Vulnerability Identification
- Vulnerability Detection
- Automated Scanning
- Ease of Use
- Features
- User Interface