Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs. Recorded Future
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management | Recorded Future |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 17 | 253 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 47.058824 | 66.129032 |
| Small Business | 35.3% | 15.8% |
| Mid-Market | 35.3% | 21.9% |
| Enterprise | 29.4% | 62.3% |
| Total page views | 206 | 2,245 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,138 | 19,366 |
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
In this era of hybrid work, shadow IT creates an increasingly serious security risk. Defender EASM helps cloud security teams see unknown and unmanaged resources outside the firewall.
Recorded Future
Recorded Future is the world’s largest threat intelligence company. Recorded Future’s Intelligence Cloud provides end-to-end intelligence across adversaries, infrastructure, and targets. Indexing the internet across the open web, dark web, and technical sources, Recorded Future provides real-time visibility into an expanding attack surface and threat landscape, empowering clients to act with speed and confidence to reduce risk and securely drive business forward.
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Threat Intelligence
- Threat Detection
- Insights
- Innovation