Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs. Notus
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management | Notus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 17 | 34 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 10.0 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 9.7 |
| NPS | 47.058824 | 97.058824 |
| Small Business | 35.3% | 44.1% |
| Mid-Market | 35.3% | 41.2% |
| Enterprise | 29.4% | 14.7% |
| Total page views | 206 | 125 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,138 | 149 |
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
In this era of hybrid work, shadow IT creates an increasingly serious security risk. Defender EASM helps cloud security teams see unknown and unmanaged resources outside the firewall.
Notus
Notus's primary focus is to overcome cyber asset visibility by integrating with a wide range of data sources, providing security teams with comprehensive, continuous, unified, and up-to-date visibility of their cyber assets. This proactive approach reveals potential gaps and facilitates the identification of devices, software, services, and configurations.
- Time-saving
- Policy Management
- Onboarding
- Product Quality
- Smooth Process
- Response Time