Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs. CODA Footprint
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management | CODA Footprint |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 17 | 11 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Ease of setup | 9.5 | 9.6 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 9.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 47.058824 | 100 |
| Small Business | 35.3% | 63.6% |
| Mid-Market | 35.3% | 18.2% |
| Enterprise | 29.4% | 18.2% |
| Total page views | 206 | 69 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,138 | 74 |
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
In this era of hybrid work, shadow IT creates an increasingly serious security risk. Defender EASM helps cloud security teams see unknown and unmanaged resources outside the firewall.
CODA Footprint
CODA Footprint is an AI-driven, cloud-agnostic Attack Surface Reduction and Vulnerability Management platform designed to make cybersecurity Accessible, Affordable, and Actionable for every business.