Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs. Breachlock
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management | Breachlock |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 17 | 38 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 9.5 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 9.3 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 9.6 |
| NPS | 47.058824 | 84.210526 |
| Small Business | 35.3% | 52.6% |
| Mid-Market | 35.3% | 39.5% |
| Enterprise | 29.4% | 7.9% |
| Total page views | 206 | 437 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,138 | 2,538 |
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
In this era of hybrid work, shadow IT creates an increasingly serious security risk. Defender EASM helps cloud security teams see unknown and unmanaged resources outside the firewall.
Breachlock
BreachLock is the only offensive security provider combining continuous ASM, autonomous pentesting, CREST-certified penetration testing, and closed-loop remediation in a single workflow within the BreachLock Unified Platform. The platform brings together three core capabilities: • BreachLock PTaaS (Penetration Testing as a Service), which pairs certified human pentesters with AI acceleration for deep, expert-led testing.
- Customer Support
- Communication
- Vulnerability Detection
- Ease of Use
- Pentesting Efficiency
- Reporting Quality